Reversibility of the effects of natalizumab on peripheral immune cell dynamics in MS patients.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the reversibility of natalizumab-mediated changes in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) following therapy interruption. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data were collected in the Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) (every 12 weeks for 116 weeks) and Randomized Treatment Interruption of Natalizumab (RESTORE) (every 4 weeks for 28 weeks) studies. Serum natalizumab and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) were measured using immunoassays. Lymphocyte subsets, α4-integrin expression/saturation, and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) binding were assessed using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Blood lymphocyte counts (cells/L) in natalizumab-treated patients increased from 2.1 × 109 to 3.5 × 109. Starting 8 weeks post last natalizumab dose, lymphocyte counts became significantly lower in patients interrupting treatment than in those continuing treatment (3.1 × 109 vs 3.5 × 109; p = 0.031), plateauing at prenatalizumab levels from week 16 onward. All measured cell subpopulation, α4-integrin expression/saturation, and sVCAM changes demonstrated similar reversibility. Lymphocyte counts remained within the normal range. Ex vivo VCAM-1 binding to lymphocytes increased until ≈16 weeks after the last natalizumab dose, then plateaued, suggesting reversibility of immune cell functionality. The temporal appearance of gadolinium-enhancing lesions was consistent with pharmacodynamic marker reversal. CONCLUSIONS: Natalizumab's effects on peripheral immune cells and pharmacodynamic markers were reversible, with changes starting 8 weeks post last natalizumab dose; levels returned to those observed/expected in untreated patients ≈16 weeks post last dose. This reversibility differentiates natalizumab from MS treatments that require longer reconstitution times. Characterization of the time course of natalizumab's biological effects may help clinicians make treatment sequencing decisions. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that the pharmacodynamic markers of natalizumab are reversed ≈16 weeks after stopping natalizumab.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Target Engagement of Natalizumab in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis.

Natalizumab (humanized immunoglobulin G4 antibody targeting alpha-4 integrins) is a highly efficacious treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) that has been in clinical use since 2006. However, natalizumab pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics and concentration alpha-4 integrin saturation relationships have not been well described in the scientific literature. Therefore, clinical data from 11 studies were pooled and analyzed to characterize the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of natalizumab in RRMS subjects. Natalizumab PK was best described using a 2-compartment model with linear first-order and Michaelis-Menten elimination. Subcutaneous absorption of natalizumab was characterized using first-order absorption with lag time. The relationship between natalizumab concentration and alpha-4 integrin saturation (PD) was best described by a direct response model with a sigmoidal effect on alpha-4 integrin saturation mediated by a maximum effect relationship with natalizumab concentrations. Covariate analysis showed that body weight, product formulations, and the presence of antinatalizumab antibodies were the main covariates affecting natalizumab PK, whereas age and formulations affected PD. The use of simulations based on a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model showed that covariates, although statistically significant, are not expected to have any clinical impact at the approved clinical dosing regimen of natalizumab (300 mg once every 4 weeks).

Exposure-disease response analysis of natalizumab in subjects with multiple sclerosis.

Natalizumab, a human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody that targets α4ß1/α4ß7 integrin, is an effective therapy approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this analysis was to develop a population exposure-response model utilizing gadolinium-enhancing (Gd) lesion count data from four clinical studies and annualized relapse rate (ARR) data from three clinical studies. The natalizumab exposures were derived for the individuals using a population pharmacokinetic model. A log-linear exposure effect on Gd lesion count and ARR adequately characterized the relationship between exposure and disease response. In the case of the Gd lesion count model, a bimodal model that distributed subjects into two subpopulations based on low or high baseline Gd lesion count provided a superior goodness of fit. The mean (95% confidence interval) slopes from the exposure-Gd lesion count model and exposure-ARR model are -0.0903 (-0.100, -0.081) and -0.0222 (-0.026, -0.015) (mg/L)-1, respectively. From these slopes, it can be inferred that both Gd lesion count and ARR decrease with increasing exposure to natalizumab in MS subjects. Model-based simulations demonstrated that although reductions in Gd lesion count and ARR were observed with lower doses (75, 150, or 200 mg), only the dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks (q4w) was associated with an ARR ≤0.25 and was considered clinically effective. The results from the exposure-Gd lesion count and exposure-ARR models thus support the appropriateness of the approved natalizumab dose (300 mg q4w) in MS subjects.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of natalizumab in Japanese multiple sclerosis patients: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label pharmacokinetic study.

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab, an anti-α4 integrin monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 and 3 studies of predominantly Caucasian patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of natalizumab in Japanese RRMS patients. METHODS: This multicenter, phase 2 study included an open-label PK/PD study in 12 patients (part A) and a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized (computer-generated sequence) study in 94 patients (part B). For part B, patients received intravenous natalizumab 300mg (n=47) or placebo (n=47) every 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of development of new active lesions (gadolinium-enhancing or new/enlarging T2 lesions) over 24 weeks. Clinical relapses and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: New active lesions developed at a significantly lower mean rate in natalizumab-treated patients (0.06 lesions/24 weeks) than in placebo-treated patients (0.35 lesions/24 weeks) (p<0.001). The annualized relapse rate was 0.53 for natalizumab and 1.73 for placebo (p<0.001). Twice as many natalizumab-treated patients (79%) as placebo-treated patients (38%) were relapse-free (p<0.001). The safety, PK, and PD profiles of natalizumab in this study were consistent with data in Caucasian RRMS patients. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese RRMS patients, natalizumab treatment every 4 weeks for 24 weeks was well tolerated and reduced the development of new brain lesions and relapses (Funded by Biogen; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01440101).

Translational biomarkers: from discovery and development to clinical practice.

The refinement of disease taxonomy utilizing molecular phenotypes has led to significant improvements in the precision of disease diagnosis and customization of treatment options. This has also spurred efforts to identify novel biomarkers to understand the impact of therapeutically altering the underlying molecular network on disease course, and to support decision-making in drug discovery and development. However, gaps in knowledge regarding disease heterogeneity, combined with the inadequacies of surrogate disease model systems, make it challenging to demonstrate the unequivocal association of molecular and physiological biomarkers to disease pathology. This article will discuss the current landscape in biomarker research and highlight strategies being adopted to increase the likelihood of transitioning biomarkers from discovery to medical practice to enable more objective decision making, and to improve health outcome.

2016 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on biomarker assay validation (BAV): (Part 3 - LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity).

The 2016 10th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (10th WRIB) took place in Orlando, Florida with participation of close to 700 professionals from pharmaceutical/biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations, and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a weeklong event - A Full Immersion Week of Bioanalysis for PK, Biomarkers and Immunogenicity. As usual, it is specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest including both small and large molecules involving LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS, and LBA approaches, with the focus on PK, biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2016 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. This White Paper is published in 3 parts due to length. This part (Part 3) discusses the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity. Parts 1 (small molecule bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (Hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) have been published in the Bioanalysis journal, issues 22 and 23, respectively.

Incidence, characterization, and clinical impact analysis of peginterferon beta1a immunogenicity in patients with multiple sclerosis in the ADVANCE trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of interferon beta in multiple sclerosis (MS) can be dampened in patients who develop neutralizing antidrug antibodies (NAbs). Peginterferon beta1a is an interferon conjugated with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety. Pegylation increases a drug's half life and exposure, and may also reduce immunogenicity. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the incidence and impact of immunogenicity to peginterferon beta1a over 2 years in patients with MS. METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS (N = 1512) were randomized to subcutaneous peginterferon beta1a 125 µg every 2 or 4 weeks, or placebo, for 1 year; patients in the placebo group were rerandomized to active treatment in year 2. The incidence and titers of binding antibodies (BAbs) and NAbs to interferon and antibodies to PEG (anti-PEG) were assessed in analytically validated assays. The clinical impact of immunogenicity on relapse and magnetic resonance imaging endpoints was evaluated. RESULTS: Over 2 years, 6%, less than 1%, and 7% of patients developed anti-interferon BAbs, NAbs, and anti-PEG antibodies, respectively. There was no discernible clinically meaningful effect of antibody status on the pharmacodynamic, efficacy, or safety parameters evaluated, although these analyses were limited by the low incidence of treatment-emergent antibodies. CONCLUSION: The treatment effect of peginterferon beta1a in patients with relapsing-remitting MS is not expected to be attenuated by immunogenicity.

Immunogenicity evaluation strategy for a second-generation therapeutic, PEG-IFN-ß-1a.

AIMS: Neutralizing antibodies can diminish clinical efficacy of IFN-ß in multiple sclerosis patients. Therefore, monitoring immunogenicity was considered critical during clinical development of a second-generation, pegylated IFN-ß product, PEG-IFN-ß-1a. MATERIALS & METHODS: Assays previously used to evaluate immunogenicity of IFN-ß-1a were used to assess PEG-IFN-ß-1a immunogenicity, with modifications to apply current best bioanalytical practices. A separate testing paradigm was used to monitor antibodies to polyethylene glycol. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: Final assay cut points and relevant titer levels were established in-study. Immunogenicity evaluation strategies for second-generation therapeutics should take into consideration current best bioanalytical practices while retaining consistency with legacy assays to facilitate data comparison and interpretation. This study illustrates challenges in assessing immunogenicity of second-generation therapeutics.

Incurred sample reproducibility and stability assessment in a cell-based drug concentration assay.

Joleen White is Principal Scientist in Translational Sciences at Biogen Idec. Throughout her career, she has applied her background in biophysical protein chemistry to pharmaceutical development in therapeutic indications with significant unmet medical need. In her current role, she supports method development and regulated bioanalysis of biomarkers, biopharmaceuticals, and immunogenicity in biological samples from nonclinical and clinical studies. Her experience with measuring macromolecules includes enzymes, monoclonal antibodies, Fc fusions, oligonucleotides, PEGylated proteins, and other novel protein constructs. She has supported studies from discovery through all phases of development including GLP nonclinical, clinical, and post-marketing commitments. Incurred samplereproducibility is one aspect of in-study validation, with white papers outlining expectations for chromatographic assays and immunoassays. This manuscript outlines an approach for performing incurred sample reproducibility for a bioequivalence study using a cell-based assay, with the complication of time elapsed between original and repeat assays. The incurred sample reproducibility passed the pre-established acceptance criteria of 45% for at least 2/3 of the samples: 174/216 samples (80.6%). Data trends between the two crossover arms were qualitatively similar. The passed incurred sample reproducibility and stability further supports the validity of the original study conclusion that the two manufacturing processes were bioequivalent. This illustrates one approach to extrapolating industry and regulatory recommendations for situations outside current guidance.

Anti-JC virus antibody levels in serum or plasma further define risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) with natalizumab treatment is associated with the presence of anti-JC virus (JCV) antibodies. We analyzed whether anti-JCV antibody levels, measured as index, may further define PML risk in seropositive patients. METHODS: The association between serum or plasma anti-JCV antibody levels and PML risk was examined in anti-JCV antibody-positive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from natalizumab clinical studies and postmarketing sources. For PML and non-PML patients, the probabilities of having an index below and above a range of anti-JCV antibody index thresholds were calculated using all available data and applied to the PML risk stratification algorithm. Longitudinal stability of anti-JCV antibody index was also evaluated. RESULTS: Anti-JCV antibody index data were available for serum/plasma samples collected >6 months prior to PML diagnosis from 71 natalizumab-treated PML patients and 2,522 non-PML anti-JCV antibody-positive patients. In patients with no prior immunosuppressant use, anti-JCV antibody index distribution was significantly higher in PML patients than in non-PML patients (p < 0.0001). Among patients who were anti-JCV antibody negative at baseline in the AFFIRM and STRATIFY-1 trials, 97% remained consistently negative or below an index threshold of 1.5 over 18 months. Retrospective analyses of pre-PML samples collected longitudinally from PML patients displayed sustained higher anti-JCV antibody index over time. INTERPRETATION: Anti-JCV antibody levels in serum/plasma, measured as index, may differentiate PML risk in anti-JCV antibody-positive MS patients with no prior immunosuppressant use. Continued evaluation of anti-JCV antibody index and PML risk is warranted.

IV immunoglobulin confounds JC virus antibody serostatus determination.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of therapeutic infusion of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) on John Cunningham virus antibody (JCV Ab) serostatus and level in serum. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of serum levels of JCV Ab among STRATIFY-2 trial enrollees from 2 multiple sclerosis centers who were exposed to IVIg during the trial. For the subset of eligible patients, we estimated mean linear trends while on IVIg and after stopping IVIg with a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: The JCV Ab seropositivity rate in the group of patients that was recently exposed to IVIg was 100%, which is significantly higher than in the IVIg-naive population (58%, p < 0.001). The seropositivity rate in the patient group with remote IVIg exposure was similar to that in the IVIg-naive population (67%, p = 0.68, Fisher exact test). The slope of the linear trend line after stopping IVIg decreased significantly by -0.310 units per 100 days (95% confidence interval, -0.611 to -0.008; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Recent IVIg exposure is invariably associated with JCV Ab seropositivity. After stopping IVIg, JCV Ab levels tend to decrease with time, and seroreversion to innately Ab-negative status can occur.

2012 AAPS National Biotech Conference Open Forum: a perspective on the current state of immunogenicity prediction and risk management.

The immunogenicity profile of a biotherapeutic is determined by multiple product-, process- or manufacturing-, patient- and treatment-related factors and the bioanalytical methodology used to monitor for immunogenicity. This creates a complex situation that limits direct correlation of individual factors to observed immunogenicity rates. Therefore, mechanistic understanding of how these factors individually or in concert could influence the overall incidence and clinical risk of immunogenicity is crucial to provide the best benefit/risk profile for a given biotherapeutic in a given indication and to inform risk mitigation strategies. Advances in the field of immunogenicity have included development of best practices for monitoring anti-drug antibody development, categorization of risk factors contributing to immunogenicity, development of predictive tools, and development of effective strategies for risk management and mitigation. Thus, the opportunity to ask "where we are now and where we would like to go from here?" was the main driver for organizing an Open Forum on Improving Immunogenicity Risk Prediction and Management, conducted at the 2012 American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists' (AAPS) National Biotechnology Conference in San Diego. The main objectives of the Forum include the following: to understand the nature of immunogenicity risk factors, to identify analytical tools used and animal models and management strategies needed to improve their predictive value, and finally to identify collaboration opportunities to improve the reliability of risk prediction, mitigation, and management. This meeting report provides the Forum participant's and author's perspectives on the barriers to advancing this field and recommendations for overcoming these barriers through collaborative efforts.

Use of a standardized MxA protein measurement-based assay for validation of assays for the assessment of neutralizing antibodies against interferon-ß.

Effective monitoring of the development of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against IFN-ß in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on IFN-ß therapy is important for clinical decision making and disease management. To date, antiviral assays have been the favored approach for NAb determination, but variations in assay conditions between laboratories and the increasing use of novel assays have contributed to the reporting of inconsistent antibody data between laboratories and between products. This study, undertaken at the request of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA), is a joint effort by manufacturers of IFN-ß products (approved in Europe) towards harmonization of a NAb assay that facilitates generation of comparable NAb data, which, in conjunction with clinical outcomes, should prove useful for clinicians treating MS patients with IFN-ß products. This article describes the standardized cellular myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) protein measurement-based assay for detection of IFN-ß NAbs and its use for the validation of assays used for the quantitative determination of such antibodies. Although titers varied between laboratories and the products used, utilization of IFN-ß1a rather than IFN-ß1b as the challenge antigen produced more consistent results in the NAb assay. Adoption of the standardized assay improves comparability between laboratories circumventing problems that arise when different, nonstandardized assays are employed for immunogenicity assessment. Based on the data, the EMA recommended for standardization purposes, the use of IFN-ß1a in NAb assays, independent of the therapeutic product used for therapy and validation of new NAb procedures against the standardized assay described.

A second-generation ELISA (STRATIFY JCV™ DxSelect™) for detection of JC virus antibodies in human serum and plasma to support progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk stratification.

BACKGROUND: JC virus (JCV) infection is a prerequisite for development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The development and validation of a two-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects JCV antibodies in human serum or plasma and its clinical utility for stratification of PML risk have been described. OBJECTIVE: To develop a second-generation JCV antibody ELISA kit with improved assay performance characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: The assay design was optimized by pre-coating the JC virus-like particles (VLP) on microtiter plates. Assay cut-points were statistically established using sera from >1300 multiple sclerosis patients from natalizumab clinical studies. The assay was analytically validated and then used to determine the presence of JCV antibodies in both treatment-naïve and natalizumab-treated MS patients, as well as in natalizumab-treated PML patients. RESULTS: An improved assay for detection of JCV antibodies in human serum and plasma was developed. Key enhancements included improved delineation and reproducibility of low JCV antibody responses and assay ease of use. The assay was validated, demonstrating good agreement with the original two-step JCV antibody ELISA, and similar seroprevalence of 50%-60%. Samples from 63 natalizumab-treated PML patients collected 6-180 months prior to PML diagnosis tested JCV antibody positive. One patient tested JCV antibody negative 15 months prior to PML diagnosis but JCV antibody positive 2 months prior to PML diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The validated second-generation JCV antibody ELISA offers improved assay design as a kit and enhanced performance characteristics that advance routine clinical use of the assay as a PML risk stratification tool.

Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions--including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity--pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Changes to anti-JCV antibody levels in a Swedish national MS cohort.

BACKGROUND: The anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody status has been introduced to stratify patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) for higher or lower risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential utility of anti-JCV antibody levels for earlier diagnosis or prediction of PML. METHODS: An analytically validated antibody assay was used to determine serological status, normalised optical density values, and dilution titres for anti-JCV antibodies. The method was applied to stored sera of 1157 patients with MS including five cases of PML, all enrolled in the Swedish pharmacovigilance study for natalizumab (NAT). Anticytomegalovirus (CMV) and antivaricella-zoster (VZV) antibody levels served as controls. RESULTS: Prior to treatment with NAT, anti-JCV antibody levels were stable in the anti-JCV positive patients. During therapy, a slight decrease in anti-JCV and anti-VZV antibody levels, but not anti-CMV antibody levels, was observed. All five patients who developed PML showed a mild to moderate increase in anti-JCV antibody levels at time of PML diagnosis; pre-PML samples suggested that this increase might start already prior to diagnosis of PML. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment initiation with NAT may lead to a slight decrease in anti-JCV and anti-VZV antibody levels, suggestive of a mild suppressive effect of NAT on antibody levels. Our findings in five cases of PML demonstrate that the onset of PML can be accompanied by increasing anti-JCV antibodies in serum. Monitoring of anti-JCV antibody levels could potentially be used as a tool for prediction or earlier diagnosis of PML during NAT treatment for MS. Further studies are warranted.

Anti-JC virus antibody prevalence in a multinational multiple sclerosis cohort.

JC virus (JCV) is an opportunistic virus known to cause progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Anti-JC virus (Anti-JCV) antibody prevalence in a large, geographically diverse, multi-national multiple sclerosis (MS) cohort was compared in a cross-sectional study. Overall, anti-JCV antibody prevalence was 57.6%. Anti-JCV antibody prevalence in MS patients ranged from approximately 47% to 68% across these countries: Norway, 47.4%; Denmark, 52.6%; Israel, 56.6%; France, 57.6%; Italy, 58.3%; Sweden, 59.0%; Germany, 59.1%; Austria, 66.7% and Turkey, 67.7%. Prevalence increased with age (from 49.5% in patients < 30 years of age to 66.5% in patients ≥ 60 years of age; p < 0.0001 comparing all age categories), was lower in females than in males (55.8% versus 61.9%; p < 0.0001) and was not affected by prior immunosuppressant or natalizumab use.

Clinical development of biosimilars: an evolving landscape.

Biosimilars, or similar biological medicinal products, can provide a meaningful option for patients and physicians provided they deliver the therapeutic value of a reference product at a more modest cost. Unlike generic small-molecule drugs that require primarily the demonstration of pharmaceutical equivalence, the complex nature of protein therapeutics warrants a rigorous evaluation of both pharmaceutical and therapeutic equivalence to the reference product in an abbreviated clinical program. Furthermore, the lack of comprehensive structure-activity relationship data increases the burden on appropriately designed human clinical studies with predefined acceptance criteria to demonstrate the absence of clinically meaningful differences between the biosimilar and reference product. Although a number of biosimilar proteins have been approved, especially in Europe, issues on substitutability, extrapolation to other disease indications, and selection of reference standards and comparators, remains to be standardized at a global level.